OCIP
OT Compliance Intelligence

From a folder of evidence to a defensible compliance posture.

OCIP assesses OT cybersecurity evidence against IEC 62443, NIST CSF 2.0, and NIST SP 800-82 — the AI marks what's proven, a reviewer decides what's final, and the platform turns the result into action.

IEC 62443-4-1/IEC 62443-4-2/NIST CSF 2.0/NIST SP 800-82
Assessment
Substation Alpha
IEC 62443-4-2
Finalized
62%
Controls passing
Pass27
Compensating5
Fail16
SR 1.1Human user identification & authPass
SR 2.1Authorization enforcementPass
SR 3.4Software & information integrityCompensating
SR 5.1Network segmentationFail
The problem

OT compliance is slow, manual, and hard to defend.

01
Evidence is scattered

Configs, policies, and screenshots live across PDFs and shared drives. Mapping each one to a control is manual archaeology.

02
Judgment is inconsistent

Two assessors, two answers — and nothing durable records why a control was marked pass or fail.

03
Audits are unforgiving

When a regulator says 'show me', you need the evidence, the decision, and the trail — in minutes, not weeks.

How it works

Evidence in. Posture out.

Four steps, one straight line — from raw documents to a finalized, auditable result.

01

Upload the evidence

Pick a framework and a target asset, then drop in the documents that prove it — PDFs, configs, policies, spreadsheets. OCIP indexes them locally; nothing leaves the box.

02

AI assesses what's proven

For every required evidence item, the assessor retrieves the relevant passages and marks it found or not found — grounded in your documents, with the source in hand. It never guesses.

03

A reviewer decides

Control status is derived deterministically from the evidence — all found is a Pass, anything missing is a Fail. A reviewer overrides where judgment differs, and finalizes. AI proposes; humans decide.

04

Posture becomes action

A gap heatmap, a remediation roadmap, generated policies, and a grounded Copilot turn the finalized result into the next move — and an audit trail you can defend.

Why it holds up

Built to be defended, not just demoed.

A compliance result is only worth as much as the reasoning behind it. OCIP keeps the reasoning explicit, the human in control, and the trail intact.

Deterministic, not a black box

Control status is derived by rule — all mapped evidence found is a Pass, anything missing is a Fail. No opaque score to argue with.

Human-in-the-loop by design

The AI only marks evidence. Every finding is reviewable and overridable, and finalizing is reviewer-gated and enforced server-side.

Grounded and traceable

Assessments and Copilot answers point back to the exact evidence and knowledge they came from — so a 'why' always has an answer.

Frameworks

The standards OT runs on.

IEC 62443-4-1
Secure product development

Lifecycle requirements for building secure OT products.

IEC 62443-4-2
Component security

Technical security requirements for IACS components.

NIST CSF 2.0
Cybersecurity Framework

Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover.

NIST SP 800-82
OT security guide

Guidance for securing operational technology and ICS.

The platform

Everything the assessment needs around it.

One workbench — from first upload to finalized posture and the work that follows.

AI Assessor

Evidence judged found / not-found, grounded in your documents.

Reviewer workflow

Override any finding, reopen, finalize — reviewer-gated, server-enforced.

Gap heatmap

Where you stand across every control, framework, and asset at a glance.

Remediation roadmap

Gaps converted to a prioritized, KB-grounded action plan.

Policy generator

Draft framework-aligned policies from templates, filtered by your gaps.

Compliance Copilot

Ask the standards. Answers cite the knowledge base they came from.

Get started

See your posture in an afternoon.

Sign in to the demo workbench, pre-loaded with a real OT assessment against IEC 62443.

Enter the workbench →
Reviewer demo · reviewer@otcyber.com